describe the imageHPS 468x60
Lowrance HDS 4 468x60

 

Become a Fan

Get our toolbar!

Follow Me

Sign up for Email Updates

Your email:

W2F Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Angler Disqualified for Tweeting During Fishing Tournament

  
  
  
  
  
  

No tweeting during fishing tournaments. Leave your social network in your pocket.

Twitter and Facebook are at the forefront of a cultural shift in society. Every day there are 20 news stories on Mashable.com about aspects of the two social networking platforms and their effects on people and society. More so than any other time in history, people are connected to each others' lives.

Many anglers are avid users of both platforms as a way to associate with other anglers that share their same passions. It’s human nature to gravitate towards people that share common interests. Our own Facebook page is an indication of the power of social networking in fishing. Many professional anglers have adopted both technologies, and everyone is able to get closer to their favorite sports and the pros that compete in the top levels of competition as a result of these new technologies.

This weekend those social platforms took one angler from one tournament and thrust him into an unfortunate situation – namely the disqualification of the angler for tweeting during a state fishing championship.

Rich Lindgren is an avid angler, blogger and active tweeter.  He was fortunate enough to compete with his team in the Bassmaster Federation Nation Minnesota Tournament of Champions this weekend on Lake Minnetonka. In fact, he was leading the event after the first day. Lindgren fishes the Federation Nation events as a means to keep the path open for a possible shot at fishing in the arguably the most lucrative tournament opportunity for an angler, the Bassmaster Classic, a dream of his since he got into fishing.

Lindgren has blogged about his local and regional tournaments often, and he’s even tweeted during the events to allow those that follow him feel connected to the event and the fishing. At the Minnetonka event, he was catching fish early and often on day one and really enjoying the day on the lake. As he was idling a boat through a very lengthy no-wake zone with no other boats in sight, he tweeted that he caught some fish and he was looking for some good culls to increase his weight for the day.

At first glance, it’s a harmless act, but unfortunately it was the beginning of the end for his dream of qualifying for the Classic, at least for this year. Under Federation Nation rules anglers are not allowed to use phones, radios, or other electronic devices to obtain fishing information while in competition. The second part of that rule is that anglers are not allowed to use phones, radios or other communication devices while in the tournament, unless in an emergency situation or to contact the tournament director.

A Federation Nation angler, not fishing in the event, saw his two or three tweets and notified the tournament director. This was on day one, yet nothing was said to Lindgren about the infraction. He weighed his fish and actually led the event going into the second day. He struggled a little on day two but still caught a decent limit and ended up finishing second in the event. After he weighed his fish, he was pulled aside by the tournament director and notified he had broken the communications rule and was subsequently disqualified from the tournament.

Rich Lindgren holding up two bass from the tournament he was disqualified from for Tweeting on Twitter.

The news was a devastating blow to him individually but also to his bass club that would have won the club portion of the competition had his weight been counted towards their total. Not only did his team not win the state championship, but his road to the classic ended.

“The reason I was tweeting was because I’ve been in the habit of promoting the fishing and the tournaments that I fish to hopefully get more folks to come to the weigh-ins or participate in the sport,” Lindgren said. “I never dreamed I was breaking a rule. But I understand now that I broke the rule, and I accept that.”

What is sometimes lost is the spirit or essence of rules in sports. The spirit of the communications rule comes down from the top levels of professional fishing. Anglers often partner up and travel and practice together. Early on when cell phones first became popular, anglers would share when the fish were biting on a certain spot or on a certain bait during tournament hours. As texting became more popular, many were sending text messages with coordinates and information.

That goes against the spirit of the “individual” sport that is tournament bass fishing (team tournaments not withstanding). Understandably, they made the rule to disallow cell phone and radio usage during tournaments because it’s hard to know what someone is doing on their phone (text, calling, twittering, messaging partners during the event).

But in this case, Lindgren was not attempting to give folks in the tournament any information or gain an unfair advantage. He was merely trying to help his fans feel more connected to the event and the fishing.

“I don’t blame the tournament director,” Lindgren said. “He’s an unpaid volunteer, and I’m not blasting him.”

Several concerns, however, arise now. Twitter and other social networking platforms are being banned in more sports during competition, but should there be a fundamental shift or re-wording of the rules or should they be more concrete than they already are?

A tournament director for a fishing tournament has a thankless job. You have to make tough decisions, sometimes against people you genuinely like. Many times the decisions are based on one person’s word over another, in which there is no concrete evidence, just the word of two equal anglers who have very different stories. Not a position most would envy.

In Lindgren’s case, the other question arises about what level of penalty there is for a rules infraction. Is there a varying scale of punishment for rules infractions? If a guy breaks a small rule, generally he is DQ’ed for the day. Lindgren was DQ’ed for the whole event after the fact. Rather than at the time he broke the rule.

Who’s to know if he had been confronted on day one and his weight DQ’ed for that day that he doesn’t then catch enough the second day for his team to win the team portion of the state championship. But rather than confront the rules infraction the first day, the director opted to wait and see if he did it again on day two and waited until the second day to then disqualify Lindgren’s entire catch.

In another scenario, if an angler catches a bass in an off limits area the first day, does a tournament director then wait until the four day event is over to then DQ his whole catch, because he wants to give the angler the opportunity to continue to break the rule rather than confront the infraction. In football if a lineman holds during a touchdown play, can you imagine the ref waiting until the game was over and then saying the team had to forfit all its points because of a play that happened in the first quarter?

“The only reason I was tweeting at all was because you have so much idle time with no wake zones, and I was catching fish really well,” Lindgren said. “In most events, I’m running and gunning from spot to spot racing up and down the lake and concentrating on fishing. I don’t even think about my phone or doing updates to Twitter or Facebook. But I had a bunch of down time in this event and saw a chance to connect folks to the tournament. I thought I was doing a good thing for the tournament. But I learned a hard lesson here.”

What do you think? We would love to know what the masses think, especially those of you that might follow Rich @hellabass on Twitter and saw the updates as this unfolded.

Comments

Rich discussed "Tweetgate" on the podcast he sometimes co-hosts with me, "Twin City Limits," on Itunes. If the moderator says its OK to share a link, I will in an ensuing comment post.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:49 PM by Lazy Ike
Seems a bit extreme. The rule should apply to sharing of information that might influence the outcome of the tournament such as bait selection, where the fish are holding, etc. Just telling people you're having a good day seems pretty harmless. He could say that to anyone in a passing boat and there would be no issue. Often times fans following boats are giving those types of updates anyway. I think the rule needs to be more pointed (at the potential problem) rather than handled with broad stroke which stops an angler from connecting with family, friends or fans.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:49 PM by Greg Meunier
A rule is a rule, et al. He should have been DQ'd. But as a tournament director, I would have handled it the day it happened; not at the end of the event. And IMO, it should have only been for the one day catch. Looks like rules will now get more specific but as now written the correct decision was made.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:52 PM by Mike Fillmer
While this rule is very clear, its the same in any fishing organization. Anglers are not allowed to use their phone unless its an emergency, and then its only to call the tournament director. 
 
While I do understand, how he wanted to send updates to his fans, I use my phone to give Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/darren.chaney> updates and twitter <http://twitter.com/fishintoolbag> updates when I am fishing for fun. you have to remember the rules. Although I think that the tournament director should have DQ'd him on the day that he sent the update. 
 
Although there is something to be said about the person that turned him in, even if you aren't fishing in the tournament and you are following him via some social network. In most cases these are so-called friends, even though you might not have ever met them, I would expect them to point this out to him first. If he then kept sending updates, then turn him in. In the case of Rich's tweets he didn't share any information and made a huge mistake. 
 
Bottom line, turn the phone off! You're there to fish, not talk on the phone.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:57 PM by Darren Chaney
The TD should've DQed him the 1st day, but however it hangs on him, he earned the hickey. Irregardless of intent, it's against the rules (which the statement is right there where you sign the entry form) "By signing, I affirm I have read and understand the rules, and agree to abide by these rules".  
If the rules say no non-emergency phone use, why would you not expect to be punished, no matter how innocent your stated intent may be? Plain as day...read all the rules, follow all the rules, and if you don't know if it's against the rules then ask the TD BEFORE you do it.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:09 PM by Alan Ellis
Feel free to post the link Greg. Thanks guys for your comments. We don't have a dog in the fight and Rich accepts that he broke the rule plain and simple. HE didn't intend to and he learned the lesson the hard way. We were just curious your thoughts on social networking in tournaments and then did the penalty fit the infraction. We have no dog in the fight but thought it would make for a great open discussion.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:31 PM by Jason Sealock
You can listen to Rich discuss this in the "Twin City Limits" podcast at: 
 
http://www.treblehookonline.com/ 
 
or at: 
 
http://twincitylimits.podbean.com/ 
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:40 PM by Lazy Ike
I was at the tournament and was informed/warned just before launch of day 2 that no tweets, non-emergency cell use or you'll be DQ'd. The TD said the caller who reported it on day 1 did not say who had tweeted fishing updates on day 1. More calls came in on day 2 saying who it was. The TD acted correctly with the information given at that given time. It was also made very clear at the TOC meeting, no cell use unless in case of emergency or calling the TD. Bass fishing spirit or not, a rule is a rule regardless of intentions.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 6:11 PM by More Details
I feel sorry for him because his intentions were innocent and he obviously wasn't using the phone in a manner that would indicate cheating or hornswoggling anyone. He just wasn't thinking and got bored. He is probably professional enough to know better, which is why he is taking it so well.  
 
The TD is a moron for not taking action the 1st day and the penalty was too severe given the unnecessary amount of time he waited to bring up the infraction. 
 
I believe the rule is in place as it is for the sake of simplicity and to avoid the appearance of cheating. If you start making more exceptions to the rule of phone use, it becomes a complex matter of interpretation and enforcement. In the case of Twitter, you can post innocent updates, or you can direct message friends and easily stumble across tips and advice from your followers. Concerning DM's, nobody would ever know what you're talking about since it is private.  
 
The best policy is to stay off the phone. A distant observer would never know if you are tweeting, using Facebook, or talking on speakerphone.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 8:21 PM by Hale
Just read the post by More Details. If true, you can't put quite as much blame on the TD. When you get to a certain level, you just can't make little. The TD was doing the field a favor by reiterating the no-phone rule on day 2. Unfortunately, it doesn't sound like Lindgren heard it.
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 8:28 PM by Hale
This is a rule that needs to be updated, I don't think the snitch that called it in should have said anything. I think it would be totally freaking awesome if kvd or hack tweeter updates through the tournament they were fishing in. I think it would be cool for the sport..... IMHO
Posted @ Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:33 PM by J moore
As a fellow blogger and friend of Rich, I have been following this from the beginning. I've blogged about it. 
 
 
 
I was not aware that the Tournament Director knew of the infraction on Day 1. If he knew of the infraction, he had to know who was guilty of it. Yet it seems held it in his pocket until the end of Day 2. If true, that is just terrible in light of the ramification for the Club Team competition and seriously calls into question the impartiality of the tournament director. Why would he have waited until the end of Day 2 to confront Rich? That makes no sense at all.
Posted @ Friday, September 17, 2010 12:46 AM by BP
Having known Rich for several years I have followed his blog, facebook and tweets. I personally have tweeted during tournaments under the exact same conditions(moving from one spot to the next)however I have never been DQ'ed. Was a rule broken by Rich, yes but I think there are some other issues as well. This was a BASS Federation Nation event which follows the same rules as the Elite Series and Opens(During the official competition days of the tournament, a competitor may not use a CB radio, a VHF marineband radio, a cellular phone, ......or any other type of communication device for the purpose of locating or catching fish. Contestants are permitted to transmit by radio or telephone only in the event of an emergency). I follow most of the pro's on twitter and have seen multiple anglers from BASS send tweets during events and use phones for non-emergency events. Several examples come to mind like Tim Horton sitting at the ramp calling for pizza after coming in several hours early is an example. Also the issue of a non-competitor in the event being able to turn in an angler is a major factor. This opens the door for anyone to turn in an angler regardless of their knowledge of the rules. I know it is to late to change what happened to Rich but I hope the officials from BASS and the FN look into this case.
Posted @ Friday, September 17, 2010 7:56 AM by Doug Cavin
I have to respectfully disagree with those that some think it should be okay to tweet during an event in the "Spirit" of the sport. It seems that if one is allowed to use their phone to tweet fishing updates, another competitor could read those updates there by getting an unfair advantage in a form of communication. Rich's tweets were rather specific to the bait he caught them on. We can't make exceptions for anglers to make tweets and not allow the rest of the field to even look at their phone. Double-standard. 
 
Posted @ Friday, September 17, 2010 8:23 AM by More Details
You don't have to read a tweet to know what guys are catching them on. Besides, if an angler tweets what bait he's throwing, it is no different than him going back to the dock or trolling by a competitor and using his other main communication device... his mouth. If you choose to give that info away, then you must feel pretty comfortable with your situation.  
 
I don't know how many times lake house owners try to give you tips... point to a submerged stump, show you where sunken brush is...  
 
The rule is what it is. It doesn't make an airtight situation, but it does discourage cheating while preventing an angler from using cool technology in a very innocent way... technology that could attract more attention to the sport and be good for sponsors too. The main thing about phones is that you can get on the internet too and nobody would know the difference. Anyone can log onto bassmaster.com and get on the water updates from reporters throughout the day.
Posted @ Friday, September 17, 2010 8:37 AM by Hale
You don't have to read a tweet to know what guys are catching them on. Besides, if an angler tweets what bait he's throwing, it is no different than him going back to the dock or trolling by a competitor and using his other main communication device... his mouth. If you choose to give that info away, then you must feel pretty comfortable with your situation.  
 
I don't know how many times lake house owners try to give you tips... point to a submerged stump, show you where sunken brush is...  
 
The rule is what it is. It doesn't make an airtight situation, but it does discourage cheating while preventing an angler from using cool technology in a very innocent way... technology that could attract more attention to the sport and be good for sponsors too. The main thing about phones is that you can get on the internet too and nobody would know the difference. Anyone can log onto bassmaster.com and get on the water updates from reporters throughout the day.  
amen
Posted @ Friday, September 17, 2010 12:27 PM by j moore
The rule is very clear. If a person is allowed to "transmit" information such as this to his friens/teammates, it presents a considerable advantage to the "sending and receiving" individuals. And meanwhile, others are competing soley on the information they have been able to put together themselves, with no help from others. Again, the rule is very clear, and there had never been any doubt in my mind about this rule. If someone wants to bend the rules, and gets caught, they pay. Using social networking during tournaments hours will get you plenty of interested observers watching you.
Posted @ Friday, September 17, 2010 1:23 PM by David Mauldin
Golly folks, I don't think some of you are aware of what goes on during tournaments. The reality is that friends and teammates give away lures and spots to each other all day long. You know how many guys in Elite Series have won money off of fish that Matt Reed has found? Sure some guys are secretive, but that is their choice. 
 
I think it was Kelly Jordan who gave Jeff Kriet a lipless crankbait while fishing the Classic because he was catching a lot of fish on it and thought it could help Kriet. What's more of an unfair advantage?... Twitter?... or giving away hot lures to a buddy during competition? 
 
In many tournaments guys fish within a cast length from each other and there are no secrets. What's next, are we going to make a rule that says you can't talk or look at your fellow competitor during competition hours? 
 
The idea that Twitter or FB will hijack the competition from bass fishing is ludicrous. Using the Classic again as an example, all those guys in Beeswax Creek knew what the other guy was doing. They could all see KVD chunking that Redeye Shad.  
 
Most of these guys are all such high level pros that they could care less what some yahoo from the outside posts on FB or Twitter. Most of them are too focused on the situation at hand to be on their phone soliciting advice from Twitterland. If an angler has to resort to Twitter to find and catch fish, he won't last long anyway.  
 
I'm not saying get rid of the rule, necessarily, but I'm just presenting a realistic perspective of what already goes on... things that are within the rules.
Posted @ Friday, September 17, 2010 5:09 PM by Hale
So I can use modern technology, such as the new GPS lake map topo units to go directly to a certain creek. I can use modern technology like the new side scan super high resolution units to fish down the creek channel. I can see every under water laydown. I can see exactly how the fish are positioned on the structure. I can give other competing anglers the modern technology Lazer Lure baits I'm catching the fish on. I just can't use modern technology to let my tweeter fans know I have a limit. That's laughable!
Posted @ Friday, September 17, 2010 6:31 PM by johnny clunn havard
This rule really just goes to show how some organizations which are run by old-timers really don't understand the impact their decisions have on a new younger generation. The fact is that we have new technology and new mediums in which to engage with the community at large. If you want to attract new fresh blood to a sport (which will arguably be what HAS to happen for the sport to continue or remain relevant), then you need to embrace the new technology which allows you to engage with the community that can't be at an event. 
 
Phones are not phones any longer. They are more computer than phone. It can easily be said this guy was NOT on a phone and was simply on a mobile computer. Just like you can turn off the "phone" in-flight, there is no difference turning on the "in-flight" mode during a tournament. 
 
This was a BAD decision and unfortunately, the early adopters and more technology savvy are the ones paying the penalty. Time to learn about the new world and embrace the technology as something to help, not hinder the sport and anglers at large. 
 
Frank
Posted @ Tuesday, September 21, 2010 1:52 PM by Frank
I agree that the penalty was too harsh and should have been dealt with on day 1. In most rules there is a certain time frame after a tournament that an official protest must be made in writing. If that rule was not followed through with then he should not have been penalized for that day even if he did break the rule. Also, he was using the mobile web on his phone to tweet so was he breaking the cell use rule? It all comes back to what is "Cell" use. I use my cells all the time so I guess everyone should have been dq'd if you are going literal here lol
Posted @ Monday, October 11, 2010 4:55 PM by John g
I competing in this tournament. I agree with the TD's call on this. I think you all are missing something here. If I was on Rich's team, hiw tweets gave me information that I could use on the water during that day. This could be viewed and providing informaiton to teammates. The TD just didn't have all the informaiton when the infraction was committed. You can't DQ someone if you don't know who it was! Again, the rules are clear and they were discussed in the pre-TOC meeting. 
 
I think the action taken was appropriate. Let it be known, you DON'T use your phone except to talk to the TD or in an emergency, period.
Posted @ Sunday, March 27, 2011 11:22 AM by X
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics