describe the imageHPS 468x60
describe the imageLowrance HDS 4 468x60

Become a Fan

Get our toolbar!

Follow Me

Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

W2F Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Pure Fishing Also Sues Normark's Sufix and Trigger X Brands

  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Trigger X Hammer Worm
Trigger X Hammer Worms

We learned this weekend that Pure Fishing also filed suit against Normark the same day in the same district court as they sued Shimano's Innovative Textiles, makers of Power Pro braid, all for patent infringements. This is nothing new in the world of tackle manufacturing.

Design patents are defended almost weekly by companies to avoid being knocked off, but only specific elements of the design can actually be patented so defending them can be tricky at best.

With the Normark suit, Pure Fishing believes that both Patent 6,174,525 which protects the biodegradable design of Gulp! and Patent 5,749,214 which protects the manner in which woven lines are strengthened (i.e. braided fishing lines strength after weave), were infringed upon by Trigger X line of biodegradable products and the Sufix line of braided fishing string.

You can actually view both the Gulp! patent and the Braided line patent online if you're so inclined to learn more about each.

It will be interesting to see how the braided line suits are settled as well as the decision on the biodegradable lures.

Three large companies are banging heads here so hopefully the end result is good ideas always make it to the masses and those that come up with new innovative designs can protect their intellectual property. We for one hope all three companies come to amiable agreement because all three companies have been very good for anglers thus far. 

Comments

Now is not the time to start to look at copy cat infringment.Heck,with all the third world nations taking the internet info and creating gear forced on US companies by the total container,well...give me three berkley Lightning rods which match and then I will agree that Pure Fishing isn't a bit fishy within the industry at times.... 
 
When it's economics and downward trends in sales the industry must ban together instead of trying to match the hatch with who created what first.Heck,half the impact of new gear was desighned years ago and just being repeated with imported parts.If Pure fishing wants to take their so called gear back,well perhaps a good long hard look into the perverbial media mirror and their past ways and days of beating up on RAPALA and others will make them think twice about bringing the industry to it's needs as many US companies are tired of it and will only leave Pure to feel as though they are as PURE as they think they are. 
 
 
 
Regards and no regrets as I will be blooging and listing many copy cat and counterfiet items which have not been so pure in the past,present and future... 
 
It's not just selling worms fellas so let's be sporting and get back to teaching and learning how to improve the industry instead of diminishing the already threatened establishments within the fishing tackle industry. 
 
Barry E. Bertino 
 
BarryTheBass
Posted @ Wednesday, November 03, 2010 2:11 AM by Barry E. Bertino
The cost for legal concil on both parties could be better invested.How about world hunger,war vets.cancer etc.There are millions of anglers who buy billions of product,there is enough money beeing spent for both companies to profit.Shame on you.
Posted @ Friday, July 29, 2011 8:23 AM by RICK
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics